OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (2013)
Approaches to Understanding Development Outcomes from Mining (ICMM, 2013)
Responsible Supply Chains in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining (OECD, 2016)
Practical actions for companies to identify and address the worst forms of child labour in mineral supply chains (OECD, 2017)
Human Rights in the Mining and Metals Industry - Overview, Managment Approach and Issues (ICMM, 2009)
Start Here: Sustainability for Exploration, Development and Small Producing Mining Companies (NBS, 2014)
Standard for Responsible Mining Draft v1.0 (IRMA, 2014)
Countering the Resource Curse: Promoting good governance and human rights in the extractive sector in Madagascar (Search for Common Ground, 2016)
Women, Communities and Mining: The Gender Impacts of Mining and the Role of Gender Impact Assessment (Oxfam Australia, 2009)
Mining: Partnerships for Development Toolkit (ICMM, 2006)
- Stakeholder engagement
- Risk assessment
Guidance Targeted Specifically at Mining Companies
The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides a framework and detailed due diligence recommendations “to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their sourcing decisions, including the choice of their suppliers” (Introduction). It is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. It includes a Supplement on Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten and a Supplement on Gold.
This report was developed to help corporate level staff understand and measure mining companies’ contributions on human and social development. It outlines a variety of tools and frameworks for designing, tracking and analysing development outcomes. The findings of these improved measurements assist corporate level staff in developing strategic approaches to realise the goal of contributing positively to the communities in which mining companies operate.
This booklet provides practical guidance and answers frequently asked questions relating to sourcing gold from artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM), globally. It clarifies expectations embodied in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (hereafter Due Diligence Guidance) which provides detailed recommendations and a practical five-step due diligence framework to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral production and sourcing practices. The Due Diligence Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.4
The OECD has developped this guidance to help companies identify, mitigate and account for the risks of child labour in their mineral supply chains. It has been developed to build on the due diligence framework of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.The OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Mineral Supply Chains identifies the worst forms of child labour as a serious human rights abuse associated with the extraction, transport or trade of minerals that companies should not tolerate, profit from, contribute to, assist with or facilitate in the course of doing business. Although the Due Diligence Guidance recommends that companies implement a supply chain due diligence risk framework in order to respect human rights, there is little detail available on how companies can conduct due diligence of child labour-related risks.
This guidance document identifies the sustainability standards, guidelines, frameworks and toolkits proven most important to managers and mining professionals and distills them into an easy-to-understand format. The document furthermore provides a complete list of all the identified sustainability resources for EDSP companies as well as a number of topic-specific Best Practices Quick Sheets (e.g. ‘Stakeholder Engagement’, ‘Grievance Mechanisms’).
The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) Standard aims to specify “best practice performance requirements that are applicable to all kinds of industrial mining worldwide, that are designed to be independently auditable at the mining site level, and that are supported by leading companies as well as civil society organizations.” The Standard is divided into 28 separate chapters organised within five broader sections: 1) Business Integrity, 2) Social Responsibility, 3) Environmental Responsibility, 4) Reclamation and Closure and 5) Management Systems. This first draft of the Standard is currently open to public comment, consultation and input to inform and refine up-coming versions. Once finalised, the IRMA Standard will be a key part of a global mining assurance system.
SFCG met en oeuvre de juillet à décembre 2016, un projet avec le soutien de l’Ambassade britannique pour promouvoir la bonne gouvernance et les droits de l’Homme dans le secteur extractif à Madagascar à travers les Principes Volontaires (PV) sur la Sécurité et les Droits de l’homme et les Principes directeurs des Nations Unies (NU) sur les Entreprises et les Droits de l’homme à Madagascar.
Le projet se concentre sur deux régions minières touchées Alaotra Mangoro et Anosy, où SFCG s’est engagé avec les compagnies minières (QMM et Ambatovy) et les communautés à contribuer à la gestion pacifique des conflits sur les questions liées à l'exploitation minière.
Dans son rôle de facilitateur impartial, SFCG a réuni les principales parties prenantes au niveau national à travers une première table ronde sur les Principes Volontaires sur la Sécurité et les Droits de l’Homme (PVSDH) en Août 2016. A noter que deux (2) tables rondes sont prévues d’être réalisées au cours du projet. A travers ces tables rondes, SFCG appuie la plate-forme RSE nationale opérant sous l’égide de la Chambre des Mines, pour explorer les pistes concrètes de mise en oeuvre de ces principes dans leurs domaines d'exploitation, en aidant les membres à identifier les actions potentielles à formuler des recommandations concrètes pour l'application effective des PVSDH et des PDEDH.
“This report informs mining company staff of the potential gender impacts of mining projects and introduces some tools and approaches that they can use to conduct a gender impact assessment of these projects.” It includes background information, provides a detailed gender impact assessment framework and identifies other gender analysis tools companies may want consider in their specific situation or context.
This toolkit tries to provide a systematic and objective way to quantify and agree ways to enhance mining’s economic and social contribution. It consists of eight modules through which the reader can learn on how to understand the social and economic impact mining has on the host country. The eight modules are the following: 1) Mining and the host country; 2) The participating mining operation and its economic and social initiatives and partners; 3) Measuring the mining industry’s contribution to the host country; 4) The proximate aspects of governance that help or hinder mining’s economic and social performance; 5) Measuring the participating mine’s positive and negative contributions to local communities; 6) Analyzing the life cycle impact of the participating mine on the host country’s macroeconomic aggregates; 7) Impact of mining on governance; and 8) Communicating your findings. There are a number of worksheet and database templates to help the reader complete each of the modules in the toolkit.
Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF)
- Stakeholder engagement